In-Depth Description of My Position on Obamacare
“Obamacare” is often used synonymously with “health care.” There is a radical difference that the media just doesn't have any interest in informing you, the American citizen, about. Health care simply means our integrated system of health insurance, routine health screening, hospitalization, doctor visits, prescription medicine, and other medical necessities that we all have. Obamacare is code for complete control of your life. Obama claims that he is not the Marxist that I call him. His actions would certainly prove otherwise—take the government annexation of America's formally private industries for starters. Obama asks for the resignation of a true capitalist who turned General Motors around (Rick Wagoner )—and he gets it? What is going on here? Czar after czar that are admitted and proud Socialists and Marxists? Here is a name you can check up on. How about Van Jones, the “Green Jobs Czar.” Hard to stomach his background, but trust me, he is not that bad compared to Hussein Obama's other czars. This guy brought a Black Panther book bag with him to Yale on his first day as a student. You recall the Black Panthers and their convictions, including the murder of police officers? Some of his other highlights include his arrest protesting the World Trade Organization, and his arrest at the scene of the Rodney King riots. When he got out of jail he proudly proclaimed, “I am a Communist.” More dangerous than just being a run- of-the-mill Communist is his association with a revolutionary Marxist group that basically worships Mao. Mao was the lovely Communist who murdered in the area of 77 million of his own people. When Communism fails (and it always does), dissenters and the poor get slaughtered so that the members of the “party” can survive. Sound familiar? I kind of compare it to the fact that Republican-owned automobile dealers that were very successful have been shut down or given to Democrat-owned businesses, even right here in Texas. Granger, of course, does nothing, as she voted for the Bailout Bill, which is the root cause and the “opening of the dark door of Marxism” in America. Now let’s look at Kay Granger. Like Obama, she claims to be something she is not—that, of course, being a “Republican.” The Republican party of Ronald Reagan, and the one that I hope to represent, would spit on the Bailout Bill HR 1424. It was a radical expansion of government that rewarded firms that lost their shirts gambling on subprime loans. Gee, why do you think the government bailed them out? Could it be the sweetheart mortgages that Democrat pig senators like Chris Dodd and Kent Conrad got? Could it be the fact that Goldman Sachs gave an insane amount of money to politicians, in the rough amount of $3,750,000 in the 2008 election cycle alone? Or could it be the countless other millions that firms just like Goldman Sachs (the American Bankers Association, for one) gave to politicians like Kay Granger? Or is it all of the above and many more?
The new scam that the politicians have created (and that I predicted) is just starting to be perpetrated on the taxpaying fool. As you probably know, the Bailout Bill transferred roughly $700 billion of your tax dollars to various banks, insurance companies, and automobile companies. I detail in my book the fact that all of these entities were major contributors to politicians, especially to Democrats. Conversely, the competitors of these firms that contributed smaller amounts or no amounts to politicians were allowed to go bankrupt, like Lehman Brothers, for example. It's just about time for some key elections in our nation, and politicians know that a large percentage of the population understands the fleecing of the taxpayer that was accomplished with the passage of HR 1424, which Kay Granger voted for. To counter this, they issued through the New York Times (your basic, wholly owned subsidiary of the Democrat party) a story that the "government got repaid and even made a profit on some of these loans." What a joke, and a vile misrepresentation of the facts. True, Goldman Sachs and others did pay the government back its loans with interest, but here is the catch that the vermin in the media don't want you to know: Goldman got major money from two sources, the government and AIG. Where do you suppose AIG got their money from? You guessed it. From the very same Bailout Bill. AIG got more than anyone else so far—a staggering $105 billion at last estimate. I can tell you from my accounting background, as well as my background of reading balance sheets, there is no shot in the world that AIG ever stays in business unless the government keeps giving them your tax dollars. I can make the case that they were used as a money laundering operation for the crooks in your government. They gave Goldman Sachs roughly $10 billion of this money. Goldman and the other pigs (including foreign owned banks) never have to repay AIG a dime as it was insurance claims against bad debts. In turn, AIG won't get this money back as it was "paying claims," so the chances of the taxpayer getting any of this back is nonexistent. AIG will be a worse taxpayer black hole than the post office or Amtrak ever could be. Same with the automobile manufacturers who constitutionally shouldn't have gotten a dime. I went to Federal Court on this issue. Feel free to read my filings, which are linked on my homepage. Furthermore, other government-run cesspools like Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are also in debt to the federal government to the tune of countless billions that I believe the taxpayer will never see.
I'll close this section with a parallel analogy. Let’s suppose you are a loan officer at a bank. Let’s suppose you lend $1 million dollars to each of ten different businesses. Upon review by your auditors, they question your sanity as these are poor risks, and they believe that the bank will lose money on these loans. Now, let’s suppose three out of your 10 businesses do pay you back with interest. Let’s further suppose that another three are in such bad shape that they ask you for more money or they might go out of business. And as for the other four, it appears that, after examining their books, they too will soon be out of business. Are you going to run to your boss and auditors with this data and say, "See, I told you so. Everything is fine with those loans. Three of them have already paid us back."? It used to shock me how dumb the media and the politicians presumed the population was. They pull this nonsense on the populations of New York and Massachusetts all the time, and I vow I will always expose it. Now watch which politicians will try to benefit from this slanted news story. I predict Obama, Pelosi, Specter, Kay Bailey Hutchison, and of course, Kay Granger amongst others.
When you think of the bailout, always think of it as Obamacare, as this exactly what you are going to get. The good people of Tarrant, Wise, Parker, and the entire state are going to be expected to work, pay higher taxes, and lose our liberties, all so illegal aliens and Leftists of every race and color can sit back and bleed us to death until we have no more blood to give. And when our blood is truly all gone, Obamacare advocates will rejoice and move into our homes. Who do you think ended up in the Capitalist Residences in countries such as Cuba and Cambodia? No matter how you vote in this critical election, if you walk away from my web site just realizing that this can happen in America, and that there are people that want America destroyed and socialized, then I will have won no matter how you cast your vote. Never mind that they are in our country—they are at Obama's dining room table making policy, like Van Johnson and others I have briefly described in other sections of my web site.
|
|